| |
The New Global Job Shift
The next
round of globalization is sending upscale jobs offshore. They include basic
research, chip design,
engineering--even financial analysis. Can America lose these jobs and
still prosper? Who wins? Who loses?
The sense of resignation inside Bank of America (BAC ) is clear from the
e-mail dispatch.
"The handwriting is on the wall," writes veteran information-technology
specialist who says he has been warned not to talk to the press. Three years
ago, the Charlotte (N.C.)-based bank needed IT talent so badly it had to
outbid rivals. But last fall, his entire 15-engineer team was told their
jobs "wouldn't last through September." In the past year, BofA has slashed
3,700 of its 25,000 tech and back-office jobs. An additional 1,000 will go
by March. Corporate downsizings, of course, are part of the ebb and flow of
business. These layoffs, though, aren't just happening because demand has
dried up. Ex-BofA managers and contractors say one-third of those jobs are
headed to India, where work that costs $100 an hour in the U.S. gets done
for $20. Many former BofA workers are returning to college to learn new
software skills. Some are getting real estate licenses. BofA acknowledges it
will outsource up to 1,100 jobs to Indian companies this year, but it
insists not all India-bound jobs are leading to layoffs.
Cut to India. In dazzling new technology parks rising on the dusty
outskirts of the major cities, no one's talking about job losses. Inside
Infosys Technologies Ltd.'s (INFY ) impeccably landscaped 22-hectare campus
in Bangalore, 250 engineers develop IT applications for BofA. Elsewhere,
Infosys staffers process home loans for Greenpoint Mortgage of Novato,
Calif. Near Bangalore's airport, at the offices of Wipro Ltd. (WIT ), five
radiologists interpret 30 CT scans a day for Massachusetts General Hospital.
Not far away, 26-year-old engineer Dharin Shah talks excitedly about his
$10,000-a-year job designing third-generation mobile-phone chips, as sun
pours through a skylight at the Texas Instrument Inc. (TXN ) research
center. Five years ago, an engineer like Shah would have made a beeline for
Silicon Valley. Now, he says, "the sky is the limit here."
About 1,600 km north, on an old flour mill site outside New Delhi, all
four floors of Wipro Spectramind Ltd.'s sandstone-and-glass building are
buzzing at midnight with 2,500 young college-educated men and women. They
are processing claims for a major U.S. insurance company and providing
help-desk support for a big U.S. Internet service provider--all at a cost up
to 60% lower than in the U.S. Seven Wipro Spectramind staff with PhDs in
molecular biology sift through scientific research for Western
pharmaceutical companies. Behind glass-framed doors, Wipro voice coaches
drill staff on how to speak American English. U.S. customers like a familiar
accent on the other end of the line.
Cut again to Manila, Shanghai, Budapest, or San José, Costa Rica. These
cities--and dozens more across the developing world--have become the new
back offices for Corporate America, Japan Inc., and Europe GmbH. Never heard
of Balazs Zimay? He's a Budapest architect--and just might help design your
future dream house. The name SGV & Co. probably means nothing to you. But
this Manila firm's accountants may crunch the numbers the next time Ernst &
Young International audits your company. Even Bulgaria, Romania, and South
Africa, which have a lot of educated people but remain economic backwaters,
are tapping the global market for services.
It's globalization's next wave--and one of the biggest trends reshaping
the global economy. The first wave started two decades ago with the exodus
of jobs making shoes, cheap electronics, and toys to developing countries.
After that, simple service work, like processing credit-card receipts, and
mind-numbing digital toil, like writing software code, began fleeing
high-cost countries.
Now, all kinds of knowledge work can be done almost anywhere. "You will
see an explosion of work going overseas," says Forrester Research Inc.
analyst John C. McCarthy. He goes so far as to predict at least 3.3 million
white-collar jobs and $136 billion in wages will shift from the U.S. to
low-cost countries by 2015. Europe is joining the trend, too. British banks
like HSBC Securities Inc. (HBC ) have huge back offices in China and India;
French companies are using call centers in Mauritius; and German
multinationals from Siemens (SI ) to roller-bearings maker INA-Schaeffler
are hiring in Russia, the Baltics, and Eastern Europe.
The driving forces are digitization, the Internet, and high-speed data
networks that girdle the globe. These days, tasks such as drawing up
detailed architectural blueprints, slicing and dicing a company's financial
disclosures, or designing a revolutionary microprocessor can easily be
performed overseas. That's why Intel Inc. (INTC ) and Texas Instruments Inc.
are furiously hiring Indian and Chinese engineers, many with graduate
degrees, to design chip circuits. Dutch consumer-electronics giant Philips (PHG
) has shifted research and development on most televisions, cell phones, and
audio products to Shanghai. In a recent PowerPoint presentation, Microsoft
Corp. (MSFT ) Senior Vice-President Brian Valentine--the No. 2 exec in the
company's Windows unit--urged managers to "pick something to move offshore
today." In India, said the briefing, you can get "quality work at 50% to 60%
of the cost. That's two heads for the price of one."
Even Wall Street jobs paying $80,000 and up are getting easier to
transfer. Brokerages like Lehman Brothers Inc. (LEH ) and Bear, Stearns &
Co. (BSC ), for example, are starting to use Indian financial analysts for
number-crunching work. "A basic business tenet is that things go to the
areas where there is the best cost of production," says Ann Livermore, head
of services at Hewlett-Packard Co. (HPQ ), which has 3,300 software
engineers in India. "Now you're going to see the same trends in services
that happened in manufacturing."
The rise of a globally integrated knowledge economy is a blessing for
developing nations. What it means for the U.S. skilled labor force is less
clear. At the least, many white-collar workers may be headed for a tough
readjustment. The unprecedented hiring binge in Asia, Eastern Europe, and
Latin America comes at a time when companies from Wall Street to Silicon
Valley are downsizing at home. In Silicon Valley, employment in the IT
sector is down by 20% since early 2001, according to the nonprofit group
Joint Venture Silicon Valley.
Should the West panic? It's too early to tell. Obviously, the bursting of
the tech bubble and Wall Street's woes are chiefly behind the layoffs. Also,
any impact of offshore hiring is hard to measure, since so far a tiny
portion of U.S. white-collar work has jumped overseas. For security and
practical reasons, corporations are likely to keep crucial R&D and the bulk
of back-office operations close to home. Many jobs can't go anywhere because
they require face-to-face contact with customers. Americans will continue to
deliver medical care, negotiate deals, audit local companies, and wage legal
battles. Talented, innovative people will adjust as they always have.
Indeed, a case can be made that the U.S. will see a net gain from this
shift--as with previous globalization waves. In the 1990s, Corporate America
had to import hundreds of thousands of immigrants to ease engineering
shortages. Now, by sending routine service and engineering tasks to nations
with a surplus of educated workers, the U.S. labor force and capital can be
redeployed to higher-value industries and cutting-edge R&D. "Silicon Valley
doesn't need to have all the tech development in the world," says Doug
Henton, president of Collaborative Economics in Mountview, Calif. "We need
very-good-paying jobs. Any R&D that is routine can probably go." Silicon
Valley types already talk about the next wave of U.S. innovation coming from
the fusion of software, nanotech, and life sciences.
Globalization should also keep services prices in check, just as it did
with clothes, appliances, and home tools when manufacturing went offshore.
Companies will be able to keep shaving overhead costs and improving
efficiency. "Our comparative advantage may shift to other fields," says City
University of New York economist Robert E. Lipsey, a trade specialist. "And
if productivity is high, then the U.S. will maintain a high standard of
living." By spurring economic development in nations such as India,
meanwhile, U.S. companies will have bigger foreign markets for their goods
and services.
For companies adept at managing a global workforce, the benefits can be
huge. Sure, entrusting administration and R&D to far-flung foreigners sounds
risky. But Corporate America already has become comfortable hiring outside
companies to handle everything from product design and tech support to
employee benefits. Letting such work cross national boundaries isn't a
radical leap. Now, American Express (AXP ), Dell Computer (DELL ), Eastman
Kodak (EK ), and other companies can offer round-the-clock customer care
while keeping costs in check. What's more, immigrant Asian engineers in the
U.S. labs of TI, IBM (IBM ), and Intel for decades have played a big, hidden
role in American tech breakthroughs. The difference now is that Indian and
Chinese engineers are managing R&D teams in their home countries. General
Electric Co. (GE ), for example, employs some 6,000 scientists and engineers
in 10 foreign countries. GE Medical Services integrates magnet, flat-panel,
and diagnostic imaging technologies from labs in China, Israel, Hungary,
France, and India in everything from its new X-ray devices to $1 million CT
scanners. "The real advantage is that we can tap the world's best talent,"
says GE Medical Global Supply Chain Vice-President Dee Miller.
That's the good side of the coming realignment. There are hazards as
well. During previous go-global drives, many companies ended up repatriating
manufacturing and design work because they felt they were losing control of
core businesses or found them too hard to coordinate. In a recent Gartner
Inc. survey of 900 big U.S. companies that outsource IT work offshore, a
majority complained of difficulty communicating and meeting deadlines. As a
result, predicts Gartner Inc. Research Director Frances Karamouzis, many
newcomers will stumble in the first few years as they begin using offshore
service workers.
A thornier question: What happens if all those displaced white-collar
workers can't find greener pastures? Sure, tech specialists, payroll
administrators, and Wall Street analysts will land new jobs. But will they
be able to make the same money as before? It's possible that lower salaries
for skilled work will outweigh the gains in corporate efficiency. "If
foreign countries specialize in high-skilled areas where we have an
advantage, we could be worse off," says Harvard University economist Robert
Z. Lawrence, a prominent free-trade advocate. "I still have faith that
globalization will make us better off, but it's no more than faith."
If the worries prove valid, that could reshape the globalization debate.
Until now, the adverse impact of free trade has been confined largely to
blue-collar workers. But if more politically powerful middle-class Americans
take a hit as white-collar jobs move offshore, opposition to free trade
could broaden.
When it comes to developing nations, however, it's hard to see a
downside. Especially for those countries loaded with college grads who speak
Western languages, outsourced white-collar work will likely contribute to
economic development even more than new factories making sneakers or mobile
phones. By 2008 in India, IT work and other service exports will generate
$57 billion in revenues, employ 4 million people, and account for 7% of
gross domestic product, predicts a joint study by McKinsey & Co. and Nasscom,
an Indian software association.
What makes this trend so viable is the explosion of college graduates in
low-wage nations. In the Philippines, a country of 75 million that churns
out 380,000 college grads each year, there's an oversupply of accountants
trained in U.S. accounting standards. India already has a staggering 520,000
IT engineers, with starting salaries of around $5,000. U.S. schools produce
only 35,000 mechanical engineers a year; China graduates twice as many.
"There is a tremendous pool of well-trained people in China," says Johan A.
van Splunter, Philips' Asia chief executive.
William H. Gates III, for one, is dipping into that pool. Although
Microsoft started later than many rivals, it is moving quickly to catch up.
In November, Chairman Gates announced his company will invest $400 million
in India over the next three years. That's on top of the $750 million it's
spending over three years on R&D and outsourcing in China. At the company's
Beijing research lab, one-third of the 180 programmers have PhDs from U.S.
universities. The group helped develop the "digital ink" that makes
handwriting show up on Microsoft's new tablet PCs and submitted four
scientific papers on computer graphics at last year's prestigious Siggraph
conference in San Antonio. Hyderabad, India, meanwhile, is key to
Microsoft's push into business software.
This is no sweatshop work. Just two years out of college, Gaurav Daga,
22, is India project manager for software that lets programs running on
Unix-based computers interact smoothly with Windows applications. Daga's
$11,000 salary is a princely sum in a nation with a per capita annual income
of $500, where a two-bedroom flat goes for $125 a month. Microsoft is adding
10 Indians a month to its 150-engineer center and indirectly employs
hundreds more at IT contractors. "It's definitely a cultural change to use
foreign workers," says Sivaramakichenane Somasegar, Microsoft's
vice-president for Windows engineering. "But if I can save a dollar,
hallelujah."
Corporations are letting foreign operations handle internal finances as
well. Procter & Gamble Co.'s (PG ) 650 Manila employees, most of whom have
business and finance degrees, help prepare P&G's tax returns around the
world. "All the processing can be done here, with just final submission done
to local tax authorities" in the U.S. and other countries, says Arun Khanna,
P&G's Manila-based Asia accounting director.
Virtually every sector of the financial industry is undergoing a similar
revolution. Processing insurance claims, selling stocks, and analyzing
companies can all be done in Asia for one-third to half of the cost in the
U.S. or Europe. Wall Street investment banks and brokerages, under mounting
pressure to offer independent research to investors, are buying equity
analysis, industry reports, and summaries of financial disclosures from
outfits such as Smart Analyst Inc. and OfficeTiger that employ financial
analysts in India. By mining databases over the Web, offshore staff can
scrutinize an individual's credit history, access corporate public financial
disclosures, and troll oceans of economic statistics. "Everybody these days
is drawing on the same electronic reservoir of data," says Ravi Aron, who
teaches management at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania.
Architectural work is going global, too. Fluor Corp. (FLR ) of Aliso
Viejo, Calif., employs 1,200 engineers and draftsmen in the Philippines,
Poland, and India to turn layouts of giant industrial facilities into
detailed specs and blueprints. For a multibillion-dollar petrochemical plant
Fluor is designing in Saudi Arabia, a job requiring 50,000 separate
construction plans, 200 young Filipino engineers earning less than $3,000 a
year collaborate in real time with elite U.S. and British engineers making
up to $90,000 via Web portals. The principal Filipino engineer on plumbing
design, 35-year-old Art Aycardo, pulls down $1,100 a month--enough to buy a
Mitsubishi Lancer, send his three children to private school, and take his
wife on a recent U.S. trip. Fluor CEO Alan Boeckmann makes no apologies. At
a recent meeting in Houston, employees asked point-blank why he is sending
high-paying jobs to Manila. His response: The Manila operation knocks up to
15% off Fluor's project prices. "We have developed this into a core
competitive advantage," Boeckmann says.
It's not just a game for big players: San Francisco architect David N.
Marlatt farms out work on Southern California homes selling for $300,000 to
$1 million. He fires off two-dimensional layouts to architect Zimay's PC in
Budapest. Two days later, Marlatt gets back blueprints and 3-D computer
models that he delivers to the contractor. Zimay charges $18 an hour, vs.
the up to $65 Marlatt would pay in America. "In the U.S., it is hard to find
people to do this modeling," Zimay says. "But in Hungary, there are too many
architects."
So far, white-collar globalization probably hasn't made a measurable dent
in U.S. salaries. Still, it would be a mistake to dismiss the trend.
Consider America's 10 million-strong IT workforce. In 2000, senior software
engineers were offered up to $130,000 a year, says Matt Milano, New York
sales manager for placement firm Atlantis Partners. The same job now pays up
to $100,000. Entry-level computer help-desk staffers would fetch about
$55,000 then. Now they get as little as $35,000. "Several times a day,
clients tell me they are sending this work off shore," says Milano.
Companies that used to pay such IT service providers as IBM, Accenture (ACN
), and Electronic Data Services (EDS ) $200 a hour now pay as little as $70,
says Vinnie Mirchandani, CEO of IT outsourcing consultant Jetstream Group.
One reason, besides the tech crash itself, is that Indian providers like
Wipro, Infosys, and Tata charge as little as $20. That's why Accenture and
EDS, which had few staff in India three years ago, will have a few thousand
each by next year.Outsourcing experts say the big job migration has just
begun. "This trend is just starting to crystallize now because every chief
information officer's top agenda item is to cut budget," says Gartner's
Karamouzis. Globalization trailblazers, such as GE, AmEx, and Citibank (C ),
have spent a decade going through the learning curve and now are ramping up
fast. More cautious companies--insurers, utilities, and the like--are
entering the fray. Karamouzis expects 40% of America's top 1,000 companies
will at least have an overseas pilot project under way within two years. The
really big offshore push won't be until 2010 or so, she predicts, when
global white-collar sourcing practices are standardized.
If big layoffs result at home, corporations and Washington may have to
brace for a backlash. Already, New Jersey legislators are pushing a bill
that would block the state from outsourcing public jobs overseas. At Boeing
Co. (BA ), an anxious union is trying to ward off more job shifts to the
aircraft maker's new 350-person R&D center in Moscow (page 42).
The truth is, the rise of the global knowledge industry is so recent that
most economists haven't begun to fathom the implications. For developing
nations, the big beneficiaries will be those offering the speediest and
cheapest telecom links, investor-friendly policies, and ample college grads.
In the West, it's far less clear who will be the big winners and losers. But
we'll soon find out.
February 3 cover story – Business Week
By Pete Engardio, Aaron Bernstein, and Manjeet Kripalani
With Frederik Balfour in Manila, Brian Grow in Atlanta, and Jay Greene in
Seattle
|
|